- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Resources
- The Prophets and Our Natural Resources
- The prophets and our resources.
The Prophets and Our Resources
Review of the previous post.
The previous post, post number 11 of 13, began a discussion of practical considerations for the method of applying ecotheology discussed in this series by presenting a couple of basic questions that must be considered.
Preview of this post.
This post, post number 12 of 13, continues the discussion of practical considerations for the method of applying ecotheology discussed in this series by presenting possible solutions that can be used in solving the problem presented by current applications of ecotheology.
B. Possible solutions
- Basic approach
The above problems can be avoided by adopting another Bible-based approach. Based on the teaching of Genesis 8 discussed above that God was pleased when Noah offered to return some part of what he was about to consume, a rule can be formed.
- One possible solution
One possible solution to this problem is to require everyone to replace what they remove from the environment with something of equal value. For example, if one purchases an automobile, one must give time equal in value to the value of the resources that went into the automobile (not value equal to the services associated with that automobile, but value equal to the raw materials used to manufacture the automobile). Again, this may be difficult to administer.
- A second possible solution
Another approach to solving this problem is by returning something to the system even if it is not the same thing as was taken out. For example, if one cannot pay for what is removed, that person must return whatever they can to the system. If not in money, then in time and/or services rendered so resources can be used elsewhere. This re-payment can be in the form of providing services for free which would otherwise have to be paid for from public funds whereby the public funds could be directed elsewhere. The saved public funds could then be directed to research, etc into more efficient use of resources. While the benefits of this may be difficult to see on a microscopic scale, the ground rule applies on a macroscopic scale and should be observed.
Preview of the next post.
The next post, post number 13 of 13, is the final post in this series and continues the discussion of practical solutions presented by the current applications of ecotheology by combining the charge presented by God to mankind in Genesis and combining the sacredness of the land with the actions of God with regard to Noah to arrive at a possible approach at finding an application of ecotheology that has a Biblical basis but is applicable to modern ecological concerns.